|
|
Post by wolf4537 on Oct 8, 2017 10:43:01 GMT -5
Not really a huge spoiler here, but 123 seconds felt very unusual. Makes me wonder how they came up with that exact number.
As far as the time limit itself, I think it should've been brought down to 120, and I think that's what will happen in the next tournament if they keep everything the same.
What do you guys think?
|
|
gt4dom
Jessie Graff
Posts: 1,059 
|
Post by gt4dom on Oct 8, 2017 10:54:20 GMT -5
Thought it was good, 115 could probably be justified but no lower than that I think. Think we'll get some Stage 1 changes for next time though so!
|
|
zocom7
Yamamoto Hiroshige
30%
Posts: 173
|
Post by zocom7 on Oct 8, 2017 11:16:10 GMT -5
I am okay with that. Even a woman like Graff can beat that time.
|
|
|
|
Post by SasukeForever on Oct 8, 2017 11:46:12 GMT -5
Hopefully they make it 115 or even 110 next time around
|
|
|
|
Post by SRW on Oct 8, 2017 14:49:53 GMT -5
Good because I want a decent show!
|
|
|
|
Post by intelligentinfer on Oct 9, 2017 7:36:50 GMT -5
Although I do like an easy stage 1 and a tough stage 2 (20+ stage 1 clears and 60% gone in stage 2 is ideal for me)
The time is way too lenient. 30 seconds left before the Warped Wall (after resting from the Tackle) is usually a lot of time but in this tournament it felt like that happened to slow competitors. It has never felt like this prior to Sasuke 33 (apart from 18-27 where there's still an obstacle before the Rope Ladder)
|
|
|
|
Post by legendty1 on Oct 9, 2017 9:57:47 GMT -5
Not really a huge spoiler here, but 123 seconds felt very unusual. Makes me wonder how they came up with that exact number. As far as the time limit itself, I think it should've been brought down to 120, and I think that's what will happen in the next tournament if they keep everything the same. What do you guys think? I agree. 123 seconds seems like such an odd number to choose. |
|
|
|
Post by wrestlingfan55 on Oct 10, 2017 12:59:34 GMT -5
Any multiple of 123 is just a huge no-no for me.
I usually like to see more haste in Stage 1 to be honest, so I wouldn't mind it being cut down to 115 seconds.
|
|
|
|
Post by edrider5 on Oct 10, 2017 22:39:59 GMT -5
Just put it at 120 secs. It us a good concise number that ends with a 5 or 0.
|
|
nekomi3
Kawashima Takayuki
Posts: 357
|
Post by nekomi3 on Oct 11, 2017 10:05:06 GMT -5
No 1st Stage time limit could be better than 115 seconds  Well... 120 is better for this era but whatever |
|
|
|
Post by TCM on Oct 11, 2017 10:30:36 GMT -5
I don't mind the time limit. 123 was lower than last time and we actually got more clears -- that just means people were prepared for it better. A Stage 1 with high clears is a monster to edit, but no clears were cut and every run past Stage 1 was shown in some capacity even if digested, which is better than it's been in the past even if that's still not ideal to some. But I'll take an easier Stage 1 knowing Stage 2 will cut them down; Sasuke still does that better than ANW. 24 down to 9 by Stage 3 is a more reasonable difficulty than 41 down to 3.
|
|
