|
|
Post by jork122 on Sept 10, 2014 21:14:08 GMT -5
|
|
arsenette
Administrator
Rambling Rican
Posts: 16,617 
Staff Member
|
Post by arsenette on Sept 10, 2014 21:26:39 GMT -5
I don't like rankings for tournaments that aren't identical. IMO obviously. Most of these lists are just used to pit fans against each other and nothing more.
|
|
Amber
Yamada Kōji
Striker 2.0
"The Earth is round you square"
Posts: 1,112
|
Post by Amber on Sept 10, 2014 21:52:03 GMT -5
Meh, some I agree with, some I don't. This list is OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by elephant52 on Sept 10, 2014 22:25:49 GMT -5
Although vandals at Sasukepedia have tried to make it seem otherwise, Yamaguchi did not clear the 1st stage in 30. His name was not shown amongst the other finishers that cleared stage 1 that tournament. So this list would need to be modified to correct that mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by LusitaniaAngel313 on Sept 10, 2014 22:43:04 GMT -5
I can't believe I read that out loud... Anyways I do agree Yuuji, Nagano, and Takeda should be high I'm kinda surprised Shingo is somewhat low. Even still fantastic list.  |
|
|
|
Post by Words Might Have Ate on Sept 11, 2014 5:23:12 GMT -5
yamada is the king of time outs not kawahara.
|
|
|
|
Post by yamfriend on Sept 11, 2014 13:46:18 GMT -5
This list is very interesting! Scnoi and I worked together on a SASUKE competitor calculator a while back (for results up to SASUKE 27), and I'd be interested in seeing how our spreadsheet formula would compare/contrast to you and your friend's when ours is up-to-date. Although each ranking system is of course subject to debate, I always find things such as these as fascinating (granted, at college I'm studying to be a math teacher, but my case still stands as a fellow SASUKE fan  ). By the way, is there any chance that your "special formula" can be provided somewhere? I don't know if I completely missed a link to it within the URL you provided (I apologize if I overlooked the obvious), but checking it out would be really neat. |
|
|
|
Post by lostinube on Sept 12, 2014 4:51:42 GMT -5
SASUKEmetrics!
For those who don't follow the usage of stats in sports, since the 70s people have been trying to find ways to use numbers to determine the "value" of players that go beyond just raw numbers. Baseball was the first to really start integrating it into management decisions (Moneyball) but all the major sports, to some degree, use math to assist in their scouting. For fans, it's another weapon used to bludgeon each other during arguments.
|
|
|
|
Post by jfeathe on Sept 12, 2014 15:02:26 GMT -5
It's always neat to see how various algorithms produce different results. Out of everything that was on and off the list, I was most surprised that Akira Omori didn't make the top 50 at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miko on Sept 20, 2014 7:52:20 GMT -5
This list is just a full of bulls**t. I don't care if nobody doesn't agree with me but ranking Lee En-Chih, Kanno, Okuyama, Matachi and for the love of god, Nagasaki above Nagano, Takeda, Takahashi and Yamamoto is totally bulls**t.
|
|
Amber
Yamada Kōji
Striker 2.0
"The Earth is round you square"
Posts: 1,112
|
Post by Amber on Sept 20, 2014 8:01:11 GMT -5
This list is just a full of bulls**t. I don't care if nobody doesn't agree with me but ranking Lee En-Chih, Kanno, Okuyama, Matachi and for the love of god, Nagasaki above Nagano, Takeda, Takahashi and Yamamoto is totally bulls**t. The All-Stars aren't in their prime anymore. No need to be so rude. |
|
|
|
Post by Miko on Sept 20, 2014 8:12:00 GMT -5
This list is just a full of bulls**t. I don't care if nobody doesn't agree with me but ranking Lee En-Chih, Kanno, Okuyama, Matachi and for the love of god, Nagasaki above Nagano, Takeda, Takahashi and Yamamoto is totally bulls**t. The All-Stars aren't in their prime anymore. No need to be so rude. Takahashi isn't All-Star and i'm not their fan. I am talking about facts and this list doesn't have any sense. |
|
).
