|
|
Post by VenusHeadTrap on Nov 29, 2009 5:10:05 GMT -5
Well, I thought it did anyway.
In several tournaments they usually skip 3 to 4 of the last 10 people in stage 1, and they aren't all always memorable or great competitors. That wasn't the case with 23, just about every single spot of the final 10 was someone we'd seen before, had done well in the last tournament or was about to do really well. The only spot I can remember that they skipped over was 91, so w/e it started on 92 and had none skipped over in betweem.
Can anyone think of or already have a better 91-100 in mind? Any tournament.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gavo on Nov 29, 2009 5:16:20 GMT -5
Firstly this was the best 91-100 ever it had everything all stars, forigners, celebrities (well just one) athletes and new stars not to mention they were 8/10.
Secondly wasn't 91 the polish dude who failed the curtain slider.
|
|
supersheep
Hashimoto Kōji
Former Admin
Posts: 2,242
|
Post by supersheep on Nov 29, 2009 5:38:26 GMT -5
yeah 91 was the polish guy that epic failed.
90 was one of the handball guys that timed out.
Anyway on track, Its either 1st or 2nd to 16
|
|
|
|
Post by yamfriend on Nov 29, 2009 17:50:37 GMT -5
Pretty good, especially what's been happening the last few tournaments to the last 10 (most notably Sasukes 19 and 22).
|
|
|
|
Post by BLM on Nov 29, 2009 18:14:10 GMT -5
I put yes and the only way i can think of to make it better is to replace the polish guy with some named, well i think it is Kawahara.
|
|
supersheep
Hashimoto Kōji
Former Admin
Posts: 2,242
|
Post by supersheep on Nov 29, 2009 18:32:35 GMT -5
I really think 16 had the best final 10 once i really looked at it. 16 had:
91: Koji Yamada
92: Shinji Kobayashi
93: Masaki Kobyashi
94: Paul Hamm
95: Jordan Jovchev
96: Bunpei Shiratori
97: Shingo Yamamoto
98: Toshihiro Takeda
99: Katsumi Yamada
100: Makoto Nagano
Keep in mind several of these were younger and in better shape than they are now (Jovchev for example). If you toss in 89 and 90 (Shunsuke and Iketani), it makes the finish that much stronger.
|
|
|
|
Post by BLM on Dec 3, 2009 21:43:22 GMT -5
I really think 16 had the best final 10 once i really looked at it. 16 had: 91: Koji Yamada 92: Shinji Kobayashi 93: Masaki Kobyashi 94: Paul Hamm 95: Jordan Jovchev 96: Bunpei Shiratori 97: Shingo Yamamoto 98: Toshihiro Takeda 99: Katsumi Yamada 100: Makoto Nagano Keep in mind several of these were younger and in better shape than they are now (Jovchev for example). If you toss in 89 and 90 (Shunsuke and Iketani), it makes the finish that much stronger. Now that you said that i change my mind but i still say kawahara should be in the top 10 |
|
FAMAS
Morikami Daisuke
Posts: 270
|
Post by FAMAS on Dec 4, 2009 13:41:04 GMT -5
I really think 16 had the best final 10 once i really looked at it. 16 had: 91: Koji Yamada 92: Shinji Kobayashi 93: Masaki Kobyashi 94: Paul Hamm 95: Jordan Jovchev 96: Bunpei Shiratori 97: Shingo Yamamoto 98: Toshihiro Takeda 99: Katsumi Yamada 100: Makoto Nagano Keep in mind several of these were younger and in better shape than they are now (Jovchev for example). If you toss in 89 and 90 (Shunsuke and Iketani), it makes the finish that much stronger. Apart from Katsumi Yamada this is the perfect 91-100. |
|
|
|
Post by BLM on Dec 4, 2009 15:17:08 GMT -5
I really think 16 had the best final 10 once i really looked at it. 16 had: 91: Koji Yamada 92: Shinji Kobayashi 93: Masaki Kobyashi 94: Paul Hamm 95: Jordan Jovchev 96: Bunpei Shiratori 97: Shingo Yamamoto 98: Toshihiro Takeda 99: Katsumi Yamada 100: Makoto Nagano Keep in mind several of these were younger and in better shape than they are now (Jovchev for example). If you toss in 89 and 90 (Shunsuke and Iketani), it makes the finish that much stronger. Apart from Katsumi Yamada this is the perfect 91-100. What is wrong with Katsumi Yamada. He is MR. SASUKE if you didnt know |
|
FAMAS
Morikami Daisuke
Posts: 270
|
Post by FAMAS on Dec 5, 2009 16:50:39 GMT -5
Yes I'm aware of that, however I don't remember him being too good at the time, he'd failed the first stage a few times before this. He maybe could be in the top 10 but I though 99 was a bit too high for him.
Also why the hell was Sato 98 in 23? I understand he's quite famous over there but I've never seen him do very well in his runs. And he's in his 40's.
|
|
supersheep
Hashimoto Kōji
Former Admin
Posts: 2,242
|
Post by supersheep on Dec 5, 2009 17:33:24 GMT -5
Sato did clear stage 1 in Sasuke 22, only 4 others can say that...
and Mr Sasuke timed out right before the finish in 16
|
|
scnoi1217
Administrator
Retired Staff
Ummm...not sure what to say here...
Posts: 3,595
Staff Member
|
Post by scnoi1217 on Dec 5, 2009 18:50:29 GMT -5
I think along with 16 and 23, you have to mention 12. 12's #91-100 had a whose who of big names at the time and included all 5 SASUKE All-Stars at the time, all of who cleared.
#91 - Kenjiro Ishimaru
#92 - Masaki Kobayashi
#93 - Shinji Kobayashi
#94 - Daisuke Nakata
#95 - Toshihiro Takeda
#96 - Shingo Yamamoto
#97 - Kazuhiko Akiyama
#98 - Katsumi Yamada
#99 - Jordan Jovtchev
#100 - Makoto Nagano
While 3 of them failed, and Kenjiro has never passed Stage 1, all are big names and all continued to do well after this. While I think that 16's final ten was probably the strongest, you gotta include 12's in the discussion.
|
|
