tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 12, 2020 7:16:44 GMT -5
Again I'm bored writing code for my CompSci thesis so I'm making a SASUKE tournament rating list out of 10 and would love to hear yours as well so it gives me even more of an excuse to procrastinate.
Here we go: S1: 8/10 S2: 7/10 S3: 7/10 S4: 9/10 S5: 8/10 S6: 5/10 S7: 7/10 S8: 8/10 S9: 4/10 S10: 5/10 S11: 6/10 S12: 9/10 S13: 3/10 S14: 7/10 S15: 6/10 S16: 6/10 S17: 7/10 (I know most people will rate this a 10 but except for Nagano's Kanzen I just didn't find it that exciting) S18: 8/10 S19: 6/10 S20: 5/10 S21: 5/10 S22: 6/10 S23: 6/10 S24: 7/10 S25: 6/10 S26: 1/10 (yes, I hate 26 that much) S27: 4/10 S28: 3/10 S29: 4/10 S30: 7/10 S31: 8/10 S32: 4/10 S33: 7/10 S34: 7/10 S35: 8/10 S36: 8/10 S37: 8/10
|
|
|
Post by ChiBiJKT48 on Jul 12, 2020 9:11:09 GMT -5
1/10: SASUKE 26 and 28
2/10: SASUKE 29 and 34
3/10: SASUKE 25 and 32
4/10: SASUKE 22 and 33
5/10: SASUKE 8, 27 and 30
6/10: SASUKE 2, 3, and 19
7/10: SASUKE 7, 14, 20, 21, and 37
8/10: SASUKE 6, 9, 13, 15, 17, 24, 31 and 35
9/10: SASUKE 10, 16, 18, 23, and 36
10/10: SASUKE 1, 4, 5, 11 and 12
Why 1/10? SASUKE 26: Bad editing, screwed order of the runs *which is what I absolutely hate from G4*, no memorable runs *except Okuyama Yoshiyuki in Second Stage*, no All-Stars in Second Stage. Almost the same with SASUKE 22, but at least we got breakthrough runs from Kanno Hitoshi and Urushihara Yuuji, so it is still forgiven.
SASUKE 28: They decide to retire the All-Stars. Bad decision. And none of the All-Stars clear First Stage. They could have 95 clears in First Stage and I will still rate this tournament 1/10 if none of them involved any of the All-Stars.
Why 10/10? SASUKE 1: All 100 competitors are shown *yes, about 60+ were digested, but they were shown at least one second, the only tournament to do so*.
SASUKE 4: Most clears in First Stage, first Kanzenseiha.
SASUKE 5: All clears only involved All-Stars.
SASUKE 11 and 12: Every All-Stars cleared First Stage, All-Stars were in their prime.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 12, 2020 9:50:28 GMT -5
Makes sense, though the ones I'm surprised at: - Why was 34 so bad for you? I thought it was a decent tournament, except for the fact that they still kept the UCCH+VLK combo that was clearly too hard as only Morimoto got past the UCCH. - 25 I didn't think was that bad, I liked the retro take on Stage 1. Stage 2 granted was disappointing, but Stage 3 I felt was super awesome, made me so excited for the tournaments to come; it was the right level of difficulty that made it insanely hard but not impossible (like 33), to the point that you'd speculate when and who would clear it finally; such a shame they made it easier. - 13 I'm surprised you rated it so highly. Nothing really happened in that tournament; it was pretty disappointing. 13 was basically to 12 what 37 was to 36, except with far more underwhelming results and no exciting moments at all. Not to mention that every All-Star who competed did worse than in 12 despite the course not actually being any more difficult.
|
|
|
Post by ChiBiJKT48 on Jul 12, 2020 12:41:11 GMT -5
Makes sense, though the ones I'm surprised at: - Why was 34 so bad for you? I thought it was a decent tournament, except for the fact that they still kept the UCCH+VLK combo that was clearly too hard as only Morimoto got past the UCCH. - 25 I didn't think was that bad, I liked the retro take on Stage 1. Stage 2 granted was disappointing, but Stage 3 I felt was super awesome, made me so excited for the tournaments to come; it was the right level of difficulty that made it insanely hard but not impossible (like 33), to the point that you'd speculate when and who would clear it finally; such a shame they made it easier. - 13 I'm surprised you rated it so highly. Nothing really happened in that tournament; it was pretty disappointing. 13 was basically to 12 what 37 was to 36, except with far more underwhelming results and no exciting moments at all. Not to mention that every All-Star who competed did worse than in 12 despite the course not actually being any more difficult. Already type it in 5 Worst Tournaments thread for SASUKE 34 and 25, but once again: SASUKE 34: No new obstacle(s), so competitors basically just train for the same tournament as before. Probably because they held it in same year, 2017, which is the first time after seven years *mind you that SASUKE 26 was taped at 2010, not 2011*. Just boring, would have been 1/10 had there is no double digit clears in First Stage. SASUKE 25: Lottery to decide the numbers. Total BS. I could apply for that tournament, granted entry, train for nothing, and get #97. Unfair. And to make things worse, #91-#97 feature four failures on first obstacle. Again, double digit clears in First Stage, and exciting Third Stage as you mention, saved it from being 1/10. Now, SASUKE 13. This is not just copy of SASUKE 12, like SASUKE 34 being a copy of SASUKE 33 or SASUKE 36 being copy of SASUKE 35 *SASUKE 37 at least had crazier Fish Bone and new but unattempted Rolling Log*. The renewal at First Stage is something I wanted after watching First Stage had 22 clears in two tournaments before, while in SASUKE 5-10, you got only 34 clears. Probably I was excited almost the same as you were excited at Third Stage renewal in SASUKE 25. And of course, it feature *for me* the best ever first obstacle in form of Prism See-Saw *shame that they dump it in next tournament for far more easier Ensuitobi*. Probably you would argue that there is double digit clears, too, so why mention the First Stage renewal when the clears were almost as exact as the same as the last two tournaments? Well, four of ten who clears First Stage was either newcomer or just appearing for the second tournament *newcomer: Ueki Shigenori and Shimizu Hideaki (both finishing in Top 20 at Trials), appearing for second tournament: Yamaguchi Kosuke and Kobayashi Masaaki (both reach Rope Climb at least the previous tournament, and one clear First Stage and Second Stage)* means that we got bright future ahead for competitors other than All-Stars. Finally, some challenge for All-Stars, what I think *and it was due to this tournament performance too that Shiratori Bunpei's performance in last tournament was not called fluke, and he become the final member of All-Stars, right?*. And of course, Nagano Makoto's performance. After close call of Kanzenseiha, Nagano didn't seem affected by it. Crush the First Stage with an insane time of only 50.97 seconds *I can't think of far lower clear time than that (after SASUKE 1-4, of course), the closest one is of course him again in SASUKE 9 by 54.15 seconds* and went for his third consecutive Final attempts *while Yamada Katsumi (SASUKE 4), Urushihara Yuuji (SASUKE 23), Matachi Ryo (SASUKE 31), Morimoto Yusuke (SASUKE 37, SASUKE 35 failure is not close call), even Mizuno Yuko (KUNOICHI 4) was affected on the next tournament, for the same close call*. Even he did almost the same result as last time, albeit for this one, it was ten centimetres worse.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 12, 2020 15:44:25 GMT -5
I think the reason they didn't change the obstacles in 34 is cos they didn't want to make it harder as the UCCH+VLK combo was already deemed almost impossible; I get your point but between 32 and 37 the modifications to the obstacles were generally super mild, bar maybe 1-2 obstacles here and there. I gave 34 a 7/10 because the editing was vastly improved compared to 33 and especially 32, and even though the results were disappointing overall we did see a lot of redemption runs from like Anastase, Suzuki, Hioki etc.
Sasuke 25 I agree the lottery was a bit uncalled for, but I personally wouldn't 100% discard a tournament's credentials because of numbering. If anything it spread out the clears a lot more rather than in most cases being bored from like #1-50 because most of them were joke competitors. Also I remember watching that Stage 3 when I was 13 thinking that there was no way anyone would be able to beat it; it was so hard that it took ANW 7 tournaments to get past it!
I see your point on Sasuke 13 and obvs I respect your opinion. The reason I personally rated it 4/10 is because with regards to your comment about the First Stage, this was a time in Sasuke where there were changes to Stage 1 almost every tournament and so most of the Stage 1 obstacles in 13 were quite forgettable imo and didn't last more than a tournament, like the Prism Tilt or the Rope Jump Hang. Also Stage 2 and 3 results were worse than in 12 despite there not actually being any real modifications to the stage; we got clear rates of 50% and 20%, compared to 91% and 30% respectively. I just personally found the results a bit boring; Bunpei failing the same Stage 3 that he cleared before, Nagano doing worse, Takeda failing the Cliffhanger that he passed before, Shingo failing Stage 2 etc. etc.
|
|
|
Post by ChiBiJKT48 on Jul 12, 2020 16:34:47 GMT -5
Well, it wasn't boring then if all of them get different results, right? Three new people clear First Stage, to get it started. Yamada Koji who did well in last tournament shockingly fail First Stage. Izumi Mika, who tipped as the first Japanese woman that can repeat Tanabe Chie's achievement, also shockingly fail Prism See-Saw. Epic wipe-out with Yusa Masami slam her face into the platform at Jump Hang *you won't get that with original Jump Hang*. Honma Kota's first breakthrough run. Nakata Daisuke running the course in perfect condition for the last time *his accident was after this tournament*. Debut of almighty Aoki Yasuo with his #79. Since a very long time, I can see Rolling Maruta off the track again *it happened twice as my memory recall, even one of it was suffered by Ishimaru Kenjiro*. And if I'm not mistaken, this is the last time I can see woman in #90s range *Izumi Mika, #96* before Jessie Graff with #98.
Bar Nagano *and Yamada of course*, every All-Stars gets huge different results than last tournament. Akiyama fail new Nejireta Kabe *although later it was known that he got bad vision at night*, Yamamoto foolishly get his leg trapped at Wall Lifting's final wall *although it was indicated in the last tournament when he literally being pressed by the wall when he squeeze himself*, Takeda had injury carried from the last tournament and can still battle his way to Cliffhanger Kai *even almost clear it*, and the main surprise, Shiratori, who fail Pipe Slider despite being so flawless on entire Third Stage, but miss that final jump *which I can later see why, as Nagano's jump was almost identical to last tournament, yet he was closer to the edge of the mat*.
And about the clear rate, this means Second Stage and Third Stage just show what they can be. Second Stage is called Speed Stage and it proved itself this time as all failures were time-outs *not Shimizu, tho, but I can conclude his failure as time-out too as when he fail Balance Tank, he only had 18 seconds left on the clock*, compared to last tournament when everyone is finishing the course in time *stupid Yamada for not taking the gloves off*, which made me think that Second Stage had lost its status as Speed Stage at that time *although later in SASUKE 18 it definitely lost its status, in my opinion*.
And the Third Stage, Body Prop and Curtain Cling really did their job well to tire everyone out, bar Nagano of course. Three additional obstacles in next tournament just completely ruin it *but I get it, you need to stop Nagano from fourth consecutive Final attempts*, that is why I give SASUKE 14 a lower rating.
This tournament could well be 10/10, but no Kanzenseiha, and, the most important one, being the first tournament without Furutachi Ichiro is what eventually made me gave this tournament 8/10 rating.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 12, 2020 19:29:00 GMT -5
Fair enough. Makes sense.
Imo I just found it a boring tournament but that’s just me. I also find 36 massively overrated as well, because again no new obstacles and once again Morimoto made the final and no one else. 37 I found more disappointing at first cos I was expecting way more clears if it wasn’t for the weather, and Stage 2 sucked cos of the rolling log being skipped, but honestly Stage 3 and 4 had so many twists and turns it was so much more exciting than 36. Unpopular opinion I know.
|
|
|
Post by casuallystranded on Jul 12, 2020 19:31:29 GMT -5
Here’s mine 1: 6/10 2: 6/10 3: 4/10 4: 7/10 5: 3/10 6: 3/10 7: 4/10 8: 9/10 9: 8/10 10: 5/10 11: 5/10 12: 5/10 13: 8/10 14: 3/10 15: 3/10 16: 8/10 17: 7/10 18: 8/10 19: 1/10 20: 2/10 21: 6/10 22: 7/10 23: 7/10 24: 9/10 25: 8/10 26: 6/10 27: 9/10 RISING: 4/10 29: 7/10 30: 9/10 31: 5/10 32: 4/10 33: 2/10 34: 5/10 35: 7/10 36: 8/10 37: 8/10
|
|
|
Post by ChiBiJKT48 on Jul 12, 2020 20:15:15 GMT -5
Fair enough. Makes sense. Imo I just found it a boring tournament but that’s just me. I also find 36 massively overrated as well, because again no new obstacles and once again Morimoto made the final and no one else. 37 I found more disappointing at first cos I was expecting way more clears if it wasn’t for the weather, and Stage 2 sucked cos of the rolling log being skipped, but honestly Stage 3 and 4 had so many twists and turns it was so much more exciting than 36. Unpopular opinion I know. Yes, SASUKE 37 is disappointing in the same way as you feel, which is why I give 7/10. To be fair, I also find it boring with SASUKE 36 as no new obstacle(s) introduced, too *could argue with Wing Slider, but obviously it was just TIE Fighter being modified*. But this tournament had many memorable things. Being the last tournament in Heisei era *I was born in this era!*. Night time setting for every runs. Torisawa Katsuhide broke the record of using same number in consecutive tournaments. Oshima Ayano almost become second Japanese woman to clear First Stage. Infamous DQ by Mori Wataru and Drew Drechsel. Double digit clears in Second Stage, which last time occurred in SASUKE 27. One-handed save on Ultra Crazy Cliffhanger by Matachi Ryo. Urushihara Yuuji clearing Ultra Crazy Cliffhanger despite being 40 years old. And of course, live Final Stage attempt by Morimoto Yusuke, which had never been done before.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 13, 2020 8:23:34 GMT -5
Here’s mine 1: 6/10 2: 6/10 3: 4/10 4: 7/10 5: 3/10 6: 3/10 7: 4/10 8: 9/10 9: 8/10 10: 5/10 11: 5/10 12: 5/10 13: 8/10 14: 3/10 15: 3/10 16: 8/10 17: 7/10 18: 8/10 19: 1/10 20: 2/10 21: 6/10 22: 7/10 23: 7/10 24: 9/10 25: 8/10 26: 6/10 27: 9/10 RISING: 4/10 29: 7/10 30: 9/10 31: 5/10 32: 4/10 33: 2/10 34: 5/10 35: 7/10 36: 8/10 37: 8/10 This is very interesting. It seems you base your ratings mainly on results, hence I'm not surprised you gave like 5, 19, 20 etc. bad ratings. I based mine on a range of results, breakthroughs, obstacles, general excitement level, and editing. That's why I rated 26 my worst because the results were lacklustre, we didn't really see any improvements in results, obstacles were largely the same and the editing was absolute trash. Whereas 5, the results were bad but this was interesting because it was the first time we'd seen the vast majority of competitors slaughtered by the First Stage (3 clears vs. 37 the tournament prior), and the introduction of some legendary obstacles. I do find it a little more boring though if there are like only 3-5 clears in Stage 1 and like 1 clear in Stage 2, because I love seeing the interesting mix of competitors we see in Stages 3 and 4, but at the same time there only tends to be a large number of clears when the course has been intentionally made easier to achieve that like with 27, so it kind of ruins it. I am surprised you rated 29 so high because of the Backstream issue and the Stage 3 timer (the latter I didn't really care about as no one cleared anyway but most people s**t on 29 for that). 31 I also thought was an awesome tournament, why did you rate it so much lower than 30 out of interest? 33 I liked but I know a lot of people didn't because of the insane difficulty of Stage 3 and the Flying Bar issue, also how they digested basically all of the strong competitors like Drew, Jun, Nagasaki. But I thought 33's Stage 2 was pretty darn awesome.
|
|
|
Post by carpclimber12 on Jul 14, 2020 16:50:40 GMT -5
This is mine 1: 8/10 2: 6/10 3: 7/10 4: 6/10 5: 7/10 6: 4/10 7: 5/10 8: 8/10 9: 7/10 10: 3/10 11: 8/10 12: 10/10 13: 9/10 14: 7/10 15: 6/10 16: 8/10 17: 9/10 18: 8/10 19: 3/10 20: 4/10 21: 5/10 22: 7/10 23: 10/10 24: 9/10 25: 5/10 26: 3/10 27: 9/10 RISING: 4/10 29: 8/10 30: 8/10 31: 6/10 32: 7/10 33: 4/10 34: 3/10 35: 6/10 36: 6/10 37: 9/10
|
|
zoran
Jessie Graff
Posts: 1,015
|
Post by zoran on Jul 14, 2020 17:29:31 GMT -5
1:7/10 2:6/10 3:8/10 4:8/10 5:7/10 6:5/10 7:5/10 8:7/10 9:7/10 10:5/10 11:8/10 12:9/10 13:8/10 14:7/10 15:7/10 16:8/10 17:9/10 18:8/10 19:7/10 20:3/10 21:9/10 22:7/10 23:9/10 24:9/10 25:6/10 26:2/10 27:8/10 28:7/10 29:7/10 30:8/10 31:9/10 32:8/10 33:6/10 34:5/10 35:8/10 36:7/10 37:8/10
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 15, 2020 8:17:36 GMT -5
1:7/10 2:6/10 3:8/10 4:8/10 5:7/10 6:5/10 7:5/10 8:7/10 9:7/10 10:5/10 11:8/10 12:9/10 13:8/10 14:7/10 15:7/10 16:8/10 17:9/10 18:8/10 19:7/10 20:3/10 21:9/10 22:7/10 23:9/10 24:9/10 25:6/10 26:2/10 27:8/10 28:7/10 29:7/10 30:8/10 31:9/10 32:8/10 33:6/10 34:5/10 35:8/10 36:7/10 37:8/10 Finally someone who agrees with me that 36 was overrated lol. I preferred 35 and 37 too. I'm surprised you rated 28, 29, and 32 so high though; most people trash on those tournaments hahaha. 32 I don't think was terrible except for really bad editing and an easy a** Stage 2, 29 I thought was okay except for the Backstream kerfuffle; 28 I hated because of the competitors list (the actual course wasn't any harder than 27, just so few strong competitors were invited hence there were only 5 clears), how they basically spoiled the results given that the New Stars just happened to be the last four men standing (including Asa who'd previously never made it past Stage 2 so it was obvious he'd done well to warrant becoming one, while Hashimoto wasn't included despite his performances so it was clear he'd failed Stage 1), the stupid box lady, the dinner table, and of course trying to retire the All-Stars. I've never been a massive All-Star fan as most of them were only at the top of their game for about 4-5 tournaments (except for Takeda and Nagano), but retiring them when Nagano had made the Third Stage literally the tournament prior is disgraceful. Only 26 I rank worse.
|
|
zoran
Jessie Graff
Posts: 1,015
|
Post by zoran on Jul 15, 2020 12:07:40 GMT -5
1:7/10 2:6/10 3:8/10 4:8/10 5:7/10 6:5/10 7:5/10 8:7/10 9:7/10 10:5/10 11:8/10 12:9/10 13:8/10 14:7/10 15:7/10 16:8/10 17:9/10 18:8/10 19:7/10 20:3/10 21:9/10 22:7/10 23:9/10 24:9/10 25:6/10 26:2/10 27:8/10 28:7/10 29:7/10 30:8/10 31:9/10 32:8/10 33:6/10 34:5/10 35:8/10 36:7/10 37:8/10 Finally someone who agrees with me that 36 was overrated lol. I preferred 35 and 37 too. I'm surprised you rated 28, 29, and 32 so high though; most people trash on those tournaments hahaha. 32 I don't think was terrible except for really bad editing and an easy a** Stage 2, 29 I thought was okay except for the Backstream kerfuffle; 28 I hated because of the competitors list (the actual course wasn't any harder than 27, just so few strong competitors were invited hence there were only 5 clears), how they basically spoiled the results given that the New Stars just happened to be the last four men standing (including Asa who'd previously never made it past Stage 2 so it was obvious he'd done well to warrant becoming one, while Hashimoto wasn't included despite his performances so it was clear he'd failed Stage 1), the stupid box lady, the dinner table, and of course trying to retire the All-Stars. I've never been a massive All-Star fan as most of them were only at the top of their game for about 4-5 tournaments (except for Takeda and Nagano), but retiring them when Nagano had made the Third Stage literally the tournament prior is disgraceful. Only 26 I rank worse. I liked 28 because it was a course renewal mainly, it had a nice simple style to it. Stage 2 was very interesting with the Backstream and Stage 3 interesting with returning old obstacles and new ones like the Vertical limit. I would have loved for the long rope final to have been attempted though. 29 I liked because of the stage 2 fuckery, the 2nd stage had long been ignored as a dull progressive stage instead of a challenge as it should be. The competitor clear pool was very diverse and interesting and the results were awesome from Morimoto and Kong.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 15, 2020 16:26:48 GMT -5
You're right about 28, but I personally felt that Stage 1 was super boring, either re-using or reincarnating obstacles. The only one I liked was the Jump Hang Kai; apart from that, the only new obstacle was the Double Warped Wall which was pathetic and boring to watch imo. Stage 2 granted was pretty awesome, but the time limit was way too lenient which meant that most people went slowly (even though Ryo timed out). Stage 3 was cool, but just like most other renewals, I knew that the tournament would end on the reincarnated Cliffhanger that no one trained for hence weren't prepared for. The actual tournament results and obstacles themselves weren't bad, it was everything else I mentioned in my above comment that made me dislike it.
I dunno about 29 man; the 'Stage 2 f***ery' you're referring to, to me was just kinda downright unfair. They turned down the jets after Hashimoto's run, then turned them up again after Kongu cleared. I felt like we would've got at least a couple more clears earned fair and square by Ryo and Yuuji if it wasn't for the borderline dangerous jet strength they faced. Also, as much as I love Morimoto, he should've 100% been disqualified as he just didn't lift that last wall. A lot of logistical issues in this tournament ruined it for me.
|
|
Rafas
Honma Kōta
sometimes
Posts: 123
|
Post by Rafas on Jul 24, 2020 6:48:46 GMT -5
woah woah woah dont tell me what to do I cant just grade all tournaments at once
|
|
|
Post by ChiBiJKT48 on Jul 24, 2020 15:54:02 GMT -5
29 I liked because of the stage 2 fuckery, the 2nd stage had long been ignored as a dull progressive stage instead of a challenge as it should be. The competitor clear pool was very diverse and interesting and the results were awesome from Morimoto and Kong. Not that ridiculous! It is a boring stage, yes, but when the negatives were more memorable than the positives, you need to ask yourself what was wrong with that stage. This is probably the only time I ever known that majority of competitors protesting for time limit to be more lenient.
|
|
tns8597
Jordan Jovtchev
100%
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by tns8597 on Jul 27, 2020 5:27:46 GMT -5
Maybe entertaining for you, but I fully sympathise with how rubbish the obstacle was this tournament. They were literally testing the obstacle on competitors' runs, as though they don't have obstacle testers themselves.... they should've tested the obstacle first and verified that the intensity was way too strong and downright dangerous, and tempered it down for the actual competitors' runs.
Controversially, I don't think the time limit was THAT bad. Kanno and Asa finished the stage in SASUKE 28 in 110 or so seconds, and they were going pretty f***ing slowly. If the Backstream had just been moderately intense, we would've probably seen Ryo and Yuuji clear which would've made for a much more exciting Stage 3 (though maybe not because they both had tendencies to get stuck under the walls and time out). I think maybe 95 or 100 seconds could've been slightly better, but I think the elephant in the room was still the Backstream.
Also, I don't hear anyone saying the same thing about the other controversy in SASUKE 30 with the Swap Salmon Ladder; that didn't make the stage more exciting, rather downright infuriating to watch, especially ruining Kong's 100% 2nd Stage clear rate.
|
|
|
Post by LusitaniaAngel313 on Jul 27, 2020 5:46:18 GMT -5
I actually made a huge ranking for all the tournaments but are ordered from most to least favorite. SASUKE 23 SASUKE 14 SASUKE 17 SASUKE 15 SASUKE 5 SASUKE 30 SASUKE 9 SASUKE 11 SASUKE 7 SASUKE 3 SASUKE 25 SASUKE 29 SASUKE 13 SASUKE 31 SASUKE 36 SASUKE 24 SASUKE 2 SASUKE 1 SASUKE 12 SASUKE 35 SASUKE 8 SASUKE 37 SASUKE 34 SASUKE 21 SASUKE 27 SASUKE 33 SASUKE 22 SASUKE 18 SASUKE 4 SASUKE 20 SASUKE 16 SASUKE 19 SASUKE 10 SASUKE 32 SASUKE 26 SASUKE 6 SASUKE 28 I made a comment for each of them. If you want to know how I think of a tournament just ask!
|
|
|
Post by Ninja Relaxer on Jul 29, 2020 15:12:03 GMT -5
I have been tabulating all the results and putting them in an Excel sheet. So far, the top tournaments are: Tournament
| Average Rating
| 23 | 8.5 | 17 | 8.2 | 12 | 8.0 | 24 | 8.0 | 30 | 7.6 |
|
|