|
|
Post by panther on Jul 16, 2018 22:13:37 GMT -5
Personally I can see arguments for all of them. I'd have to say 3-5 though as it's a good balance between drama and entertainment of watching multiple people beat the course
|
|
|
|
Post by ekkerb11 on Jul 16, 2018 22:34:06 GMT -5
I agree. I think what’s more important is that people get to obstacle 9. Last year obstacke 9 was rare.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt723894 on Jul 17, 2018 16:34:53 GMT -5
I chose 3-5. That means the course wasnt overkill and the people who finished get the spotlight put on them. When theres more then five clears, the people who cleared dont get to stand out and show how strong they truly are, especially for unknowns. When theres this many of clears, the people who truly have a shot at stage 3 get to shine.
|
|
tyler
Satō Hiromichi
Posts: 247 
|
Post by tyler on Jul 17, 2018 17:44:37 GMT -5
I selected 1-2. I like the drama of will anyone beat it. When there's too many, completing the course is not as big of an achievement. I like it when a few do it. But I like seeing obstacle 9 get used. But the whole will anyone clear this obstacle is really entertaining to me. I loved cannonball alley for this reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Al Bundy on Jul 18, 2018 5:45:28 GMT -5
2-4
|
|
|
|
Post by Kane-Not-Kosugi on Jul 18, 2018 14:16:06 GMT -5
1-2 means typically the cutoff is the 8th obstacle, and that gets boring to watch. 3-5 sounds like it has a good balance of 8th/9th obstacle fails, so I pick 3-5.
|
|
