|
Post by The Chief on Apr 8, 2009 23:00:41 GMT -5
Takeda the most clears Akiyama the most fails.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:11:15 GMT -5
Takeda the most clears Akiyama the most fails. Incorrect *every other member gives sigh of relief*
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:12:04 GMT -5
Takeda, most clears Yamada, most fails
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:12:48 GMT -5
Takeda, most clears Yamada, most fails I knew saying Chief something or another was incorrect gave it away. Correct. I'm at Sasuke 3 Stage 1 and a half.
|
|
|
Post by gazzawhite on Apr 8, 2009 23:14:30 GMT -5
Takeda, most clears Yamada, most fails I knew saying Chief something or another was incorrect gave it away. Correct. I'm at Sasuke 3 Stage 1 and a half. Haven't Yamada and Akiyama both failed the 1st stage 10 times in the first 21 tournaments?
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:15:33 GMT -5
sasuke 1, stage 3
If you add the numbers of all of the all stars, which all star has the highest number? What is that number?
|
|
|
Post by The Chief on Apr 8, 2009 23:17:26 GMT -5
Actually, yes, Akiyama failed Stage 1 in Sasukes 6,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,17,20. Yamada: Sasukes 7,8,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21
|
|
SuperTiger
Yamada Kōji
Kunoichi-san
*meyolow*
Posts: 1,188
|
Post by SuperTiger on Apr 8, 2009 23:26:50 GMT -5
Nagano-4279
BTW, technically this counts as a math question and isnt there a petition for that?
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:30:27 GMT -5
You're wrong lfrt The petition is only against you asking math questions.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:31:47 GMT -5
I knew saying Chief something or another was incorrect gave it away. Correct. I'm at Sasuke 3 Stage 1 and a half. Haven't Yamada and Akiyama both failed the 1st stage 10 times in the first 21 tournaments? Yamada failed 11 times sasuke 1, stage 3 If you add the numbers of all of the all stars, which all star has the highest number? What is that number? Akiyama Kazuhiko: 4146 Nagano Makoto: 4179 Takeda Toshihiro: 4470 Yamamoto Shingo: 4385 Shiratori Bunpei: 948 (missing the anniversaries took alot off the numbers) Yamada Katsumi: 4724 I don't believe it... Yamada Katsumi has the highest numbers..
|
|
|
Post by The Chief on Apr 8, 2009 23:34:20 GMT -5
Haven't Yamada and Akiyama both failed the 1st stage 10 times in the first 21 tournaments? Yamada failed 11 times Which ones, name them.
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:34:34 GMT -5
Katsumi Yamada is right, but look at your numbers, its wrong.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:37:05 GMT -5
Katsumi Yamada is right, but look at your numbers, its wrong. So do I get this or not? What? Are you counting the anniversary numbers as their normal numbers and not 9__/1000 or 19__/2000 Where am I wrong? Bad counting. or wrong part. Nevermind.
|
|
|
Post by The Chief on Apr 8, 2009 23:42:09 GMT -5
You're wrong lfrt The petition is only against you asking math questions. no, all math questions.
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:44:48 GMT -5
Katsumi Yamada is right, but look at your numbers, its wrong. So do I get this or not? What? Are you counting the anniversary numbers as their normal numbers and not 9__/1000 or 19__/2000 Where am I wrong? I'm counting 1000 as 1000 not 100. You added wrong I think. I added the numbers and about 99% sure its not 4724.
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:45:13 GMT -5
I'm counting 1000 as 1000 not 100. You added wrong I think. I added the numbers and about 99% sure its not 4724.[/quote]
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:52:14 GMT -5
Katsumi Yamada is right, but look at your numbers, its wrong. So do I get this or not? What? Are you counting the anniversary numbers as their normal numbers and not 9__/1000 or 19__/2000 Where am I wrong? I'm counting 1000 as 1000 not 100. You added wrong I think. I added the numbers and about 99% sure its not 4724. Well I'm not going to have to re-do everyone's number about anniversary tournament numbers am I?
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 8, 2009 23:55:50 GMT -5
Let me make this clear: I'm counting anniversary numbers, so if you used the anniversary numbers keep it the same, but if you didn't add 900 or 1900 to it.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Apr 8, 2009 23:59:02 GMT -5
Are you trying to tell me you're looking for 3824 for Yamada?
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Apr 9, 2009 0:03:53 GMT -5
Are you trying to tell me you're looking for 3824 for Yamada? No. How did you get that? 4724 was closer than 3824, thats all I'm telling you now.
|
|