|
|
Post by obakemono on Sept 14, 2009 14:47:58 GMT -5
It's that time again. SPOILER RULES.
After Sasuke 23 airs, there are to be no spoilers or any discussion of results anywhere but this subforum. That means only this board, titled 'Sasuke 23'.
Deliberately breaking this rule means a temporary ban. This is only for people who set out to ruin it for others, but if you slip up several times, you'll be warned as a reminder.
No spoilers in thread titles. For example, 'Nagano's Run' is okay, 'Nagano's Third Stage Run' is not.
This applies to the G4 forums also. Deliberate spoilers over there will be punished over here.
What counts as a spoiler:
-Results. Where competitors failed.
-Someone completed the course.
-Identities of ANW winners.
-'Mr Octopus did not achieve total victory' is a spoiler.
What doesn't:
-Saying who competed, apart from ANW.
-New obstacle details, although don't mention how people failed/passed them.
This should last until the G4 broadcast in December.
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Sept 14, 2009 16:47:38 GMT -5
What counts as a spoiler:-'Mr Octopus did not achieve total victory' is a spoiler. lol |
|
|
|
Post by SRW on Sept 14, 2009 19:47:51 GMT -5
Can't I say Yasuo Aoki did not achieve Kanzenseiha? or is that too big a spoiler?
|
|
|
|
Post by penguincatfish on Sept 14, 2009 20:41:03 GMT -5
Everyone's probably just joking with these things, but just wanna put it out there anyway.
A spoiler's a spoiler, regardless of content, be it a major one like total victory or an entirely expected first obstacle fall of a joke(?) competitor.
|
|
lars072
Jessie Graff
10%
Posts: 1,001
|
Post by lars072 on Sept 21, 2009 22:40:11 GMT -5
No spoilers in thread titles. For example, 'Nagano's Run' is okay, 'Nagano's Third Stage Run' is not. But wouldn't saying "Levi's Run' be a spoiler as it would tell people that he had participated? |
|
|
|
Post by supernovamaniac on Sept 22, 2009 10:19:58 GMT -5
No spoilers in thread titles. For example, 'Nagano's Run' is okay, 'Nagano's Third Stage Run' is not. But wouldn't saying "Levi's Run' be a spoiler as it would tell people that he had participated? -Identities of ANW winners. Doesn't that say enough? READ. Jesus you're like rider no.2 |
|
lars072
Jessie Graff
10%
Posts: 1,001
|
Post by lars072 on Sept 22, 2009 10:59:01 GMT -5
But wouldn't saying "Levi's Run' be a spoiler as it would tell people that he had participated? -Identities of ANW winners. Doesn't that say enough? READ. Jesus you're like rider no.2 Yeah yeah, yeah, you can make your point without being so flippin' condescending. Wait, I shouldn't use such big words on this board. I keep forgetting that the average user on here still can't drive a car. |
|
scnoi1217
Administrator
Retired Staff
Ummm...not sure what to say here...
Posts: 3,595
Staff Member
|
Post by scnoi1217 on Sept 22, 2009 16:27:27 GMT -5
Knock it off. And lars, your hardly one to talk about condescending when some of your posts recently have been less than polite...
Anyway...keep it on track and leave out the personal attacks.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblind168 on Sept 22, 2009 17:01:36 GMT -5
so quick thing.
if i were to post in general sasuke "who is omori's biggest fan" then say in the post that he's goin, is that okay?
also if i werw 2 go on g4 and say hes competiting, that okay?
and a spoiler thread for ANW results is bad... or fine, so long as i dont reveal names in the title?
|
|
Ninja Chris
Jessie Graff
Chris Christensen
Posts: 1,037
|
Post by Ninja Chris on Sept 25, 2009 19:10:00 GMT -5
Your rules state that you cannot say who ran a certain stage (Other than first stage I guess), or if if someone (general blanket statement) passed a certain stage, but is it allowed to discuss a stage?
Such as "Stage 3 Discussion (SPOILERS)"
I'd guess that it's fine, but just wish to clarify.
|
|
|
|
Post by VenusHeadTrap on Sept 26, 2009 2:17:27 GMT -5
Your rules state that you cannot say who ran a certain stage (Other than first stage I guess), or if if someone (general blanket statement) passed a certain stage, but is it allowed to discuss a stage? Such as "Stage 3 Discussion (SPOILERS)" I'd guess that it's fine, but just wish to clarify. Technically still a spoiler, even though it's harmless and there are always 3rd stage runs.. well, not always. So that's the point, no mentions of what stages were reached. |
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Sept 26, 2009 8:12:29 GMT -5
Or at least make it so it can't be seen by the front page...
When 22 came around I made a final stage topic. But I worded it like this
"What are your thoughts on the new stage of final" instead of "Final Stage Thoughts"
|
|
|
|
Post by obakemono on Sept 26, 2009 8:40:34 GMT -5
Your rules state that you cannot say who ran a certain stage (Other than first stage I guess), or if if someone (general blanket statement) passed a certain stage, but is it allowed to discuss a stage? Such as "Stage 3 Discussion (SPOILERS)" I'd guess that it's fine, but just wish to clarify. Don't need spoiler tags. After the airing, this entire subforum will be effectively spoiler zone. That would be fine, and come to think of it, I think I'll remove the bit about Final Stage discussion. That was more for 22 when no one had made it there yet, and TBS have already mildly spoiled it in that respect anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by yamfriend on Oct 8, 2009 14:40:47 GMT -5
-'Mr Octopus did not achieve total victory' is a spoiler. That'll be the first thing I say about Sasuke 23 once it's broadcast on G4.  In Sasuke 24, though, Mr. Octopus will achieve total victory. ;D |
|
