supersheep
Hashimoto Kōji
Former Admin
Posts: 2,242
|
Post by supersheep on Jun 15, 2010 16:28:10 GMT -5
This one is ok because he hadn't posted in this and its still a running topic.
|
|
|
Post by intelligentinfer on Jun 19, 2010 10:02:20 GMT -5
90- Brian 91- New person 92- Kanno 93- Takahashi 94- Okuyama 95- Li En Zhi 96- Yamamoto 97- Takeda 98- Hashimoto 99- Nagano 100- Urushihara No Sato? I thought TBS loves him.
|
|
|
Post by vokloko on Jun 28, 2010 9:23:09 GMT -5
they do, but I didn't feel like putting him in.
|
|
|
Post by m4tt3r0x on Jul 10, 2010 18:22:57 GMT -5
I understand Nagano is big over there is Japan, but I don't think he should be getting this speacial treatment anymore. He isn't the champion anymore, and lately he has been doing the worst of the all-stars. He shouldn't be 99 and should be treated just like all the other all-stars. Im not trying to start a big dispute, so please accept my opinion as an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Jul 10, 2010 18:52:15 GMT -5
and lately he has been doing the worst of the all-stars. He's not just the only All-Star to make it to the Final Stage in Shin Sasuke.. But he's the only All-Star to make it to the final stage since Sasuke 12.. And he did it in 13, 17 and 23... And he was the first person to even attempt the Shin Cliffhanger and one of 3 to make it to Stage 2 in 20..
|
|
|
Post by Mjyr1 on Aug 16, 2010 6:53:26 GMT -5
89: If Shiratori competes, Levi. Otherwise, the highest ANW qualifier who isn't Levi or Brian. 90: Sato 91: Kanno 92: If Shiratori competes, him. Otherwise, Levi. 93: Yamamoto 94: Takeda 95: Okuyama/Takahashi 96: Takahashi/Okuyama 97: Nagano 98: Hashimoto/Enchi 99: Enchi/Hashimoto 100: Urushihara
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2010 15:28:13 GMT -5
#90:Brian Orosco #91:Yamamoto Shingo #92:Takeda Toshihiro #93:Paul Anthony Terek #94:Levi Meeuwenberg #95:Nagano Makoto #96:Urushihara Yuuji #97:Okuyama Yoshiyuki #98:Takahashi Kenji #99:Hashimoto Koji #100:Li En Zhi
*Wakky will probably get 35 if he's even there. Sato will get 89 if he's there. No number over 30 for Aoki, Choshu, Kuramochi, Dandy, and Harashima.
|
|
|
Post by m4tt3r0x on Aug 16, 2010 16:34:48 GMT -5
I hope that list is a joke... Why would Terek be ahead of Takeda and Shingo? Why would Urishihara be #96 instead of #100? Just because a few people did better than him in one tourament does not mean his number would go down 4 notches. Wakky will probably be 35? That's the most random thing I've heard on this whole thread. "Everyone thinks I'm cool." You can't control my feelings.... I could go on all day...
|
|
|
Post by YoDaUO on Aug 16, 2010 17:05:12 GMT -5
#90:Brian Orosco #91:Yamamoto Shingo #92:Takeda Toshihiro #93:Paul Anthony Terek #94:Levi Meeuwenberg #95:Nagano Makoto #96:Urushihara Yuuji #97:Okuyama Yoshiyuki #98:Takahashi Kenji #99:Hashimoto Koji #100:Li En Zhi Wow........ You basicly put it as if Sasuke 25 was the first Sasuke. Btw, I modifed my list (first post)
|
|
|
Post by intelligentinfer on Aug 16, 2010 21:24:32 GMT -5
and lately he has been doing the worst of the all-stars. He's not just the only All-Star to make it to the Final Stage in Shin Sasuke.. But he's the only All-Star to make it to the final stage since Sasuke 12.. And he did it in 13, 17 and 23... And he was the first person to even attempt the Shin Cliffhanger and one of 3 to make it to Stage 2 in 20.. Even when all the all-stars failed stage 1 he is still the one who got furthest(19- with the most time left and 22) and his stg 1 failures are all accidents. He just needs to get out of this inconsistentcy (like Kongu) and he will blast off to the top of the tower each time.
|
|
|
Post by r3dcomet on Aug 18, 2010 20:26:14 GMT -5
89 - Satō Hiromichi 90 - Levi Meeuwenberg 91 - Yamamoto Shingo 92 - Kanno Hitoshi 93 - Takeda Toshihiro 94 - Brian Orosco 95 - Nagano Makoto 96 - Okuyama Yoshiyuki 97 - Hashimoto Koji 98 - Li En Zhi 99 - Takahashi Kenji 100 - Urushihara Yuuji
Ok now I got it. 96-99 Can be in any order since each of them has been RIGHT there and close the last 2-3 tourneys
Edit: Thank you for pointing that out I was looking at the wrong spot when figuring out my numbers XD
|
|
|
Post by TCM on Aug 18, 2010 20:30:38 GMT -5
I'd hate to make it seem like I'm bashing your picks, but while you're correct in him having 96 twice, he was wearing 99 when he won, his other time with 96 was in 18 and we know what happened there.
|
|
|
Post by YoDaUO on Aug 18, 2010 21:16:55 GMT -5
Wow.. im super suprised by SOME of these lists. Nagano will NOT go under 99 unless he screws up at LEAST 2 more times.
I really doubt that Hashimoto or Takahashi will get a higher # than Takeda.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2010 21:37:53 GMT -5
100. Yuuji 99. Nagano 98. Li En Zhi 97. Kenji Takahashi 96. Koji Hashimoto 95. Tekada 94. Kanno 93. Okuyama 93. New guy 92. Kanno 91. Levi 90. Yamamoto
|
|
chackpop
David Campbell
25%
Posts: 1,543
|
Post by chackpop on Aug 18, 2010 21:39:23 GMT -5
Wow.. im super suprised by SOME of these lists. Nagano will NOT go under 99 unless he screws up at LEAST 2 more times. I really doubt that Hashimoto or Takahashi will get a higher # than Takeda. Where's the love for Hashimoto? The dude got the second farthest in Sasuke 24 and 25.
|
|
|
Post by RiderLeangle on Aug 18, 2010 22:11:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by yamfriend on Aug 18, 2010 23:40:19 GMT -5
Thinking about #90-100 in 26 makes me wonder if they're going to do the lottery again (probably not, but you never know...).
|
|
|
Post by roy on Aug 23, 2010 0:46:48 GMT -5
hey this is my first post here, so here's what I think the order will be:
90- Levi 91- Yamamoto 92- Kanno 93- Orosco 94- Okuyama 95- Takeda 96- Hashimoto 97- Kongu 98- Lee Yen Chi 99- Nagano 100- Yuuji
|
|
|
Post by theannoyingninja on Aug 26, 2010 14:51:12 GMT -5
Wow.. im super suprised by SOME of these lists. Nagano will NOT go under 99 unless he screws up at LEAST 2 more times. I really doubt that Hashimoto or Takahashi will get a higher # than Takeda. This^ Yes, I'm too lazy to type it ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2010 20:41:55 GMT -5
|
|